When the whole world believed that the sun rotates round the earth, and when a person argued that the earth is really moving around the sun, he was branded "blasphemous" by the contemporary "good" people. The harsh comments to my earlier blogs are all well expected from our contemporary "reasonable" people. But STILL what I can say is that women DO have an upper hand over men in the contemporary society.

You are most welcome to comment on my blogs either favourably or otherwise; I won't delete it. I had deleted comments from three people so far. Sorry for that. I will put them here (In all the three cases I had sent my replies to the respective people while deleting).
(1) Comment from "The Princess" was : "A woman can be a man most of the times but can a man be a woman for a single day?"
My reply was: "If a woman can be a man most of the times, a man CAN be a woman; but that will be possible only in my dream society"
(2) Comment from Nilesh was (for the blog:"What Dr. Johnson told might be correct?"): "The point no 6 apllies to either ways ,remember; your comments at the end of the blog suggest that only the people who commented your blogs favourably have rational thinking; Is it fair and right?"
(3)My reply to "Harmless Lawyer" may be found in his guest book; His comments may be got from his iland. Since his comments are too long and many in numbers, I can't put them here.

I thank all who commented favourably or otherwise.

THE BEST COMMENT I saw was:"woman or man ...does'nt matter... just look at them like humans... all will be fine ... Nature made us to dwell together... its better for the man the woman and for humanity as a whole... " .But sadly this has been implemented from mens' side only.

I think many have misinterpreted my sentence:"it is better to be murdered while one is a feotus than to suffer the whole life of harassment". What I am really intending to convey by this is:"Women are really lucky to be murdered while they are feotus while men are not killed while they are feotus forcing them to undergo a whole life of harassment".

Also people tell "Is it possible for a man to give birth to a child?" What I can say is: "Is it possible for a woman alone to give birth to a child?"(human cloning is still not legal!)


NOW, by just reading a blog about mens' rights, if people get so much irritated, can you just imagine the harassment men have to face while reading every news paper, magazine (since they have thousands of articles like this; but arguing about womens' rights and no comments against them)? If it is irritating to just read my blogs what shoud be the frustration level of men who are made to sit hearing the speech by womens' activists?

Finally, I would like to quote from the autobiography of Gandhi who was a good lawyer (these are not the exact words since I don't have the copy of the book besides me now; don't think that these are not the exact words translated from Gujarathi and hence incorrect; but the meaning is exactly the same): "Many a times wrong can be proved right and the right may be proved wrong by lawyers; but this is not the limitation of the subject "law" and it does not mean that the right is wrong and the wrong is right; it is the limitation of the advocate who argues in favour of right; if an able lawyer argues, it should be possible for the right to win" . SAME THING MAY BE APLLIED FOR BLOG. If I cannot properly "prove" what I am telling, it only indicates that I am not a good "advocate" but since what I am saying IS THE truth, a better advocate should be able to prove these.